# NeuroLink vs WFGY — Fit & Features

Canonical: https://trutool.co/compare/neurolink-vs-wfgy
Author: Snehil (https://trutool.co/authors/snehil)

Compare NeuroLink and WFGY by use case, features, limitations, and evaluation questions.

## Compare fit, features, and limitations

### NeuroLink
The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across three inference types: generate, stream, and a calibrated decide (via TypeSafe Jev). MCP-native, voice (TTS/STT/realtime), RAG, memory, file.
Best fit: People and teams evaluating ai memory & retrieval for a specific workflow.
- Core product workflow
Before you choose: Test a representative task, inspect outputs, and confirm integrations, permissions, data handling, licensing, and current costs.
Pricing: https://github.com/pricing
- [Read NeuroLink profile](https://trutool.co/tools/neurolink): Read NeuroLink profile

### WFGY
WFGY is heading toward WFGY 5.0 Polaris Protocol, a major open-source release for AI reasoning, RAG, agents, and real-world workflows. Includes Problem Map, Global Debug Card, WFGY 4.0, and the CFV Easter Egg.
Best fit: People and teams evaluating ai memory & retrieval for a specific workflow.
- Core product workflow
Before you choose: Test a representative task, inspect outputs, and confirm integrations, permissions, data handling, licensing, and current costs.
Pricing: https://github.com/pricing
- [Read WFGY profile](https://trutool.co/tools/wfgy): Read WFGY profile